20210903, 01:29  #45 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow
2^{5}×83 Posts 
QUEUED AS C157_79_87
C157 from aliquot sequence 79^87 for 14e queue: Code:
n: 4951817282321300125121563283973266890130432071999797605619959055323522627836598971946187541604723115152173600067798128300469087299960489125577620433072170779 # norm 3.275088e15 alpha 8.292521 e 2.016e12 rroots 5 skew: 49957707.18 c0: 208235189039389218619688718428466586619079 c1: 37781536379467125545223981130069230 c2: 489180382520633806645059772 c3: 38418454921101676246 c4: 239285831493 c5: 5016 Y0: 3970832215081885247847712953140 Y1: 114941225847724939 rlim: 33500000 alim: 33500000 lpbr: 29 lpba: 29 mfbr: 58 mfba: 58 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 2.6 type: gnfs lss: 0 Last fiddled with by swellman on 20210903 at 01:51 
20210904, 12:24  #46 
Sep 2008
Kansas
2^{3}×431 Posts 
QUEUED AS 417__011_3m1
C153 from the OPN file t800. 417170460427416024594567400793767674921146783636256059892715875174336683894076800036991320011^31 Code:
n: 931716212649329827085826874632296805522376190752443111047033777427443503981234835282738781393247938253896381553901865467679801153870597073922973731405293 lss: 0 Y0: 607288295848199450676009139407 Y1: 204889130532497 c0: 17500403064728538394138027311449717866616 c1: 5584264633247370913975802344435818 c2: 292017629100948579858061139 c3: 25997407300505227152 c4: 203479838212 c5: 11280 skew: 23852827.67 # size 6.655e15, alpha 8.500, combined = 3.359e12 rroots = 5 # expecting poly E from 2.92e12 to > 3.35e12 type: gnfs rlim: 33500000 alim: 33500000 lpbr: 29 lpba: 29 mfbr: 58 mfba: 84 rlambda: 2.5 alambda: 3.4 Code:
Q Yield 8M 13743 10M 13780 20M 15438 30M 13296 Last fiddled with by swellman on 20210904 at 14:12 
20210905, 01:18  #47 
Sep 2008
Kansas
2^{3}·431 Posts 
417__011_3m1
This number is yielding below expectations. I've double checked the poly and my sieve results. Everything looks fine.
The one anomaly is the yield at 20M. Usually the curve is fairly flat for GNFS numbers in this range. Based on the surrounding yield numbers it should be about 13,4xx. This could explain the lower than expected. Maybe keep an eye on the ongoing results because the Q range may need to be increased by 5M or 6M. 
20210905, 02:30  #48  
Apr 2020
3·167 Posts 
Quote:


20210905, 09:44  #49 
Sep 2008
Kansas
6570_{8} Posts 
Could a couple percent be attributed to the poly being at the high end of the Escore range?

20210905, 10:00  #50  
Sep 2008
Kansas
2^{3}×431 Posts 
Quote:
Code:
total yield: 15438, q=20005003 (0.24873 sec/rel) 323 Special q, 477 reduction iterations 

20210905, 11:21  #51 
Apr 2020
3×167 Posts 
Yield per specialq = 15438/323 = 47.796
Expected number of specialq in 5k range at 20M = 5000/ln(20000000) = 297.42 Corrected yield estimate = 47.796*297.42 = 14215 
20210905, 12:41  #52 
Sep 2008
Kansas
3448_{10} Posts 
I went through the exercise to compute estimated from actual.
Code:
Q actual estimated === ====== ========= 8M 13743 12423 10M 13780 13072 20M 15438 14215 30M 13296 13001 total 63M 59M Edit: I guess I must have randomly hit a few hot spots to skew the numbers. Last fiddled with by RichD on 20210905 at 12:44 
20210905, 13:15  #53 
Apr 2020
3×167 Posts 
Normally a hot spot is just a range with more specialq than expected. The variation in rels/q smooths out pretty well over a 5k range. I tried some more ranges and got the following:
Code:
Q Actual Estimated 13M 13427 13800 16M 12182 13856 23M 14168 13977 26M 13255 13525 
20210909, 22:30  #54 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow
2656_{10} Posts 
QUEUED AS C162_159978_10752
C162 from 159978:i10752 for 14e queue: Code:
n: 307971724803606446462872819609832224962609961269161295963764484634572235683426075635658509577753868636513892744089422683812968625603917337113577082298516439966433 # norm 1.157002e15 alpha 7.090889 e 1.110e12 rroots 3 skew: 11451205.90 c0: 3944555032855439079562882441928924509762 c1: 202025289949929521507548847820369 c2: 191219311077986300620049528 c3: 14361015183390153921 c4: 951667925579 c5: 68820 Y0: 21387460552177921418441173809027 Y1: 247235112212624731 rlim: 67000000 alim: 67000000 lpbr: 30 lpba: 30 mfbr: 60 mfba: 60 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 2.6 type: gnfs lss: 0 Last fiddled with by swellman on 20210910 at 02:15 
20210911, 14:25  #55  
Jun 2012
C83_{16} Posts 
Quote:


Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Queue management for e_small and 15e queues  VBCurtis  NFS@Home  202  20211022 15:59 
System management notes  kriesel  kriesel  10  20210901 15:56 
Run down the queue on MPRIME without quitting GIMPS  Rodrigo  Software  7  20180525 13:26 
Improving the queue management.  debrouxl  NFS@Home  10  20180506 21:05 
split a prime95 queue & client installation  joblack  Information & Answers  1  20090106 08:45 